|
AMAKAZU Case Statement of Murata - 6 January 1947 (420) Murata states that this case decided in 1923, decided that a subordinate could be convicted for carrying out an illegal order. |
||||||||
|
Statement of Itezona According to Itezona, the case held that a subordinate could not be held for the killing when done under a superior order. |
||||||||
|
Interrogation of Oki If an inhumane order is carried out by a subordinate, said subordinate is exonerated. |
||||||||
Note: Complete reference to this case - it does hold that the subordinates who were ordered to commit an unlawful act could not be found guilty of the criminal intent necessary to sustain conviction. |
This book documents the legal proceedings of the December 1949 Khabarovsk trial in which twelve members of the Japanese Army's covert biological warfare Unit 731 were prosecuted for their war crimes. The trial sought to hold key leaders in Japan's bio-weapons program accountable for atrocities after WWII.